← All guides

Best Models to Run on Popular RTX GPUs (August 2026): 3090, 4090, 5090 & RTX PRO 6000

Four RTX cards cover almost every local-LLM build in August 2026: the used 3090 at 24GB, the 4090 at 24GB, the 5090 at 32GB, and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 96GB. The model that wins on each is different, and the reason is always the same — bandwidth sets your speed, VRAM sets your ceiling. On 24GB cards a small-active MoE like Gemma 4 26B-A4B beats every dense model. On the 5090, Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B hits ~118 tok/s. On 96GB, gpt-oss 120B finally fits in one card at full context.

Building an RTX rig for OpenClaw?

See our AI training options. We'll pick the model, quant, and context window for the exact card you own — and wire it into OpenClaw.

🎮 THE FOUR CARDS IN THIS GUIDE

24 GB gets you 27B-35B MoE models. 32 GB adds real context headroom. 96 GB runs 120B in one card.

Bottom Line

  • RTX 3090 (24GB, 936 GB/s)Gemma 4 26B-A4B Q4_K_M, ~16GB, ~71 tok/s. Best value in local AI, full stop.
  • RTX 4090 (24GB, 1008 GB/s)Gemma 4 26B-A4B Q4_K_M at ~85 tok/s, or Laguna XS 2.1 Q4_K_M at ~86 tok/s for agentic coding.
  • RTX 5090 (32GB, 1792 GB/s)Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B Q4_K_M, ~22GB, ~118 tok/s. The 8GB over a 4090 buys context, not just speed.
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (96GB, 1792 GB/s)gpt-oss 120B MXFP4, ~65GB, ~51 tok/s at full 128K context. One card, frontier-class open weights.

One rule explains all four rows: MoE models with small active-parameter counts win on every RTX card. A 26B model with 4B active decodes at 70-85 tok/s. A dense 27B on the same card decodes at 31-37. Same VRAM, half the speed.

RTX 3090 — 24GB, the value floor

The used 3090 is still the cheapest card that runs a 32B-class model entirely in VRAM with no CPU offload. Its 936 GB/s is the slowest of the four, which is exactly why MoE matters most here.

ModelQuantVRAMSpeedWhy
Gemma 4 26B-A4BQ4_K_M~16 GB~71 tok/sBest generalist; 4B active keeps it fast on slow bandwidth
gpt-oss 20BMXFP4~13.8 GB~73 tok/sCleanest tool calls — the OpenClaw agent pick
Qwen 3.5 35B-A3BQ4_K_M~20 GB~71 tok/sBigger total params, same speed class
LFM2 24B-A2BQ4_K_M~14 GB~98 tok/sFastest option; 2B active, lighter reasoning
Qwen 3.6 27B (dense)Q4_K_M~18 GB~31 tok/sStrong quality, but you feel the 936 GB/s

Our pick: Gemma 4 26B-A4B at Q4_K_M. It leaves ~8GB for KV cache, so 32K context is comfortable. Run gpt-oss 20B alongside it as your agent driver.

EVGA RTX 3090 24GB on Amazon →

RTX 4090 — 24GB, the same ceiling, 20% more speed

Identical VRAM to the 3090, 1008 GB/s instead of 936, and much better prompt-processing throughput. Every model above runs here, faster.

ModelQuantVRAMSpeedWhy
Gemma 4 26B-A4BQ4_K_M~16 GB~85 tok/sBest all-round pick at 24GB
Laguna XS 2.1 (33B/3B MoE)Q4_K_M~20.3 GB~86 tok/sAgentic coding; 70.9% SWE-Bench Verified
gpt-oss 20BMXFP4~13.8 GB~87 tok/sProduction OpenClaw agent loops
Qwen 3.5 35B-A3BQ4_K_M~20 GB~84 tok/sBroadest knowledge in the MoE class
Qwen 3.6 27B (dense)Q4_K_M~18 GB~37 tok/sQuality per GB, if you can accept the speed

Our pick depends on the job. Chat and general work: Gemma 4 26B-A4B. Coding agents: Laguna XS 2.1. The catch on 24GB is context — Laguna at 20.3GB leaves under 4GB for KV cache, so cap it around 8-16K. That single limit is the argument for a 5090.

GIGABYTE RTX 4090 24GB on Amazon →

RTX 5090 — 32GB, the context card

The 5090 pairs 32GB of GDDR7 with 1,792 GB/s, 77% more bandwidth than a 4090. Speeds roughly double on MoE models, and the extra 8GB turns 16K-context builds into 64K-context builds.

ModelQuantVRAMSpeedWhy
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3BQ4_K_M~22 GB~118 tok/sBest overall; fastest strong model on the card
Laguna XS 2.1 (33B/3B MoE)Q4_K_M~20.3 GB~121 tok/sCoding agent with ~64K context headroom
Gemma 4 26B-A4BQ4_K_M~16 GB~118 tok/sLeaves 16GB for very long context
Qwen 3.6 27B (dense)Q4_K_M~18 GB~52 tok/sDense quality at usable speed
Gemma 4 31B (dense)Q4_K_M~20 GB~46 tok/sLargest dense Gemma that fits well

Our pick: Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B at Q4_K_M. At ~118 tok/s it reads faster than most cloud APIs feel, and the 10GB of slack holds a large KV cache. Buy the 5090 for the ceiling and the context, not the raw tok/s number.

GIGABYTE RTX 5090 32GB on Amazon →

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell — 96GB, the 120B threshold

Three times the 5090’s VRAM at the same 1,792 GB/s, with ECC GDDR7 and native NVFP4 support. This is the first single card that holds a 120B-class model plus a full 128K context.

ModelQuantVRAMSpeedWhy
gpt-oss 120BMXFP4~65 GB~51 tok/sFrontier-class open weights, full 128K context, one card
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3BQ4_K_M~50 GB~83 tok/sBest speed-per-quality on the card
Qwen 3.5 122B-A10BQ4_K_M~72 GB~41 tok/sBroadest knowledge that fits
Llama 4 Scout (109B)Q4_K_M~67 GB~35 tok/sLong-context Llama option
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3BQ8_0~39 GB~73 tok/sNear-FP16 quality, huge context budget

Our pick: gpt-oss 120B at MXFP4. It is the reason to buy this card — 65GB of weights leaves 30GB for context and concurrency, and MXFP4 was co-designed for Blackwell’s 4-bit tensor cores. Move to NVFP4 builds where your serving stack supports them; quality tracks FP8 at half the memory.

The honest caveat: street price sits near $13,000, well above the $8,565 launch MSRP. Two 5090s cost far less and give you 64GB — but split across cards, which rules out single-model 120B inference at full context.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96GB on Amazon →

Which Card Should You Buy?

  • Under $1,000 — used RTX 3090. Runs 90% of what a 4090 runs, 20% slower.
  • You already own a 4090 — keep it. The upgrade buys context, not capability.
  • $2,000-2,500 — RTX 5090. The 32GB ceiling is the real product.
  • You need 120B in one card — RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, and nothing else in the RTX line.

OpenClaw Setup (any card)

ollama pull gemma4:26b-a4b-q4_K_M      # 3090 / 4090
ollama pull qwen3.6:35b-a3b-q4_K_M     # 5090
ollama pull gpt-oss:120b               # RTX PRO 6000
openclaw config set agents.defaults.models.chat ollama/gemma4:26b-a4b-q4_K_M
openclaw config set agents.defaults.models.agent ollama/gpt-oss:20b
openclaw config set agents.defaults.keep_alive 30m

Keep gpt-oss 20B as the agent model on 24GB and 32GB cards. Its tool-call JSON is the most reliable of any open-weight model, and reliability beats raw benchmark score inside an agent loop.

See Also

Need OpenClaw fixed live?

Remote rescue sessions for gateway, auth, tunnel, VPS, and model access problems.

See Rescue Session

Read next

Best Models to Run on the Biggest Mac Studio (August 2026): 96GB New, 256GB Used
Apple pulled the 512GB M3 Ultra in March 2026 and the 256GB in May — the biggest Mac Studio you can order new is 96GB. Best models for each tier: gpt-oss 120B (23-60 tok/s), Qwen3-VL 235B Q4 (~30 tok/s), GLM-4.7 358B Q3 (~15 tok/s), Llama 4 Maverick, and why DeepSeek V4 Flash finally runs local.
Best Local LLMs for 96GB RAM (June 2026): Llama 4 Scout, DeepSeek V4 Flash & gpt-oss 120B Q5
Best local LLMs for 96GB RAM in June 2026. Llama 4 Scout (10M context, ~58GB Q4), DeepSeek V4 Flash (~80GB Q4), gpt-oss 120B at Q5 (~80GB), Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B, Mistral Small 4 at Q5. Mac Studio M3 Ultra territory.
Best Local LLM for MacBook Pro M4 Max (July 2026): 36 to 128GB Picks
Best local LLM for the MacBook Pro M4 Max, updated July 2026. Tier picks: 36GB Qwen 3.6 27B Q6, 64GB Llama 3.3 70B Q5, 128GB Mistral Small 4. Coding pick: Laguna XS 2.1.
Best Models to Run on AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Boxes (August 2026)
Best local LLMs for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Strix Halo) 128GB mini-PCs in August 2026. Qwen3-30B-A3B at ~100 tok/s, gpt-oss 120B at 31-55 tok/s, Llama 4 Scout at ~18 tok/s, dense 70B at ~5 tok/s. Framework Desktop, GMKtec EVO-X2, HP Z2 Mini G1a compared against DGX Spark and Mac Studio.